DETAINED ABROAD
Foreign nationals imprisoned across the Indo-Pacific face acute vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. Unfamiliar laws, language barriers, and inadequate legal representation leave them disproportionately exposed to the risk of torture and ill-treatment in custody, and to the application of the death penalty. These risks are compounded when consular access is denied or delayed. Without timely notification of their right to embassy or consulate support, foreign nationals may unknowingly waive critical legal protections, face trial without adequate representation, and remain unaccounted for to their families for months or years.
Detained Abroad is a free legal resource that maps the rights of foreign nationals who are imprisoned, facing the death penalty, or at risk of torture across the Indo-Pacific region. For each country, it examines the applicable domestic legal framework, identifies where it falls short of international standards, and sets out the protections and remedies available in practice, including the procedures that allow foreign nationals to serve their sentences in their home country.
For a consolidated overview of the international legal standards referenced across this site, see the International Legal Framework page.
Vietnam
Death Penalty
International obligations:
Acceded (1982)
Not Ratified
Torture & Ill-Treatment
Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013, Article 20
Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13), Articles 373, 374, 377
Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13), Article 8
International obligations:
Ratified (2015)
Not ratified
Imprisoned Foreign Nationals
International obligations:
Ratified (1992)
Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13); Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13)
Situation Overview
SECRET
CLASSIFIED STATISTICS
Lack of Transparency
Read more…Vietnam does not publish data on death sentences or executions. Since 2018, all such statistics have been formally classified as a state secret, and no official figures are released. Amnesty International confirmed that executions took place in 2024 but was unable to provide a credible minimum figure. Internal prosecutorial reports, referenced in state media, indicate that over 2,000 people were sentenced to death and over 400 executed in the decade to 2025.
9
SENTENCED IN 2023
Drug Trafficking Focus
Read more…Vietnam holds foreign nationals under sentence of death, though the total is unknown. In 2023, at least nine foreign nationals were sentenced to death — nationals of Taiwan, Laos, Cambodia, and South Korea — primarily for drug trafficking and transport. Foreign nationals on death row have also included nationals of Malaysia, Singapore, and Australia. In 2022, four foreign nationals were among 31 prisoners whose death sentences were commuted to life imprisonment by presidential decree.
10
REMAINING CAPITAL CRIMES
2025 Penal Code Reform
Read more…On 25 June 2025, the National Assembly amended the Penal Code to abolish the death penalty for eight offences, including espionage, illegal drug transport, embezzlement, and accepting bribes. The amendments took effect on 1 July 2025, reducing capital offences from 18 to 10. Persons already sentenced to death for these offences had their sentences converted to life imprisonment.
OPCAT
NOT RATIFIED
Coerced Confessions
Read more…The Human Rights Committee has expressed serious concern about torture and ill-treatment used to extract confessions in criminal proceedings (including in capital cases) about prolonged solitary confinement and leg shackling as disciplinary measures, and about the absence of independent complaints mechanisms for detained persons. The 2024 US State Department Human Rights Report recorded at least two detainee deaths under suspicious circumstances during that year. Vietnam has not ratified OPCAT and has no independent national preventive mechanism.
JULY 2026
EFFECTIVE DATE
Repatriation Framework
Read more…The Law on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (passed 26 November 2025, in force 1 July 2026) permits foreign nationals sentenced in Vietnam to apply to serve their sentence in their home country, subject to dual criminality, a final judgment, at least one year remaining, and consent of both states and the individual.
Legal Framework in Practice
Detention & Identity
Who qualifies as a foreign national under Vietnamese law?
Under the Law on Vietnamese Nationality (Law No. 24/2008/QH12, as amended), a foreign national is any person who holds the nationality of a country other than Vietnam. Stateless persons (those who hold neither Vietnamese nor any foreign nationality) form a separate category and are not treated as foreign nationals under this definition.
Vietnamese nationality is conferred primarily by descent. Vietnam formally recognises only one nationality per person, though the law permits exceptions in limited circumstances, including for persons who have made contributions to national development or who have a Vietnamese spouse, parent, or child. Overseas Vietnamese who enter Vietnam using a foreign passport are treated as foreign nationals for immigration and legal purposes, even if they retain Vietnamese nationality under Vietnamese law.
One practical complexity arises for persons of Vietnamese origin holding dual nationality. If such a person enters Vietnam on a foreign passport, Vietnamese authorities may treat them as a foreign national. This has implications for consular protection, as Vietnam may not recognise a foreign state’s consular jurisdiction over a person it considers Vietnamese.[8]Law on Vietnamese Nationality (Law No. 24/2008/QH12, 13 November 2008, as amended by Law No. 56/2014/QH13 and Law No. 56/2025/QH15) arts 3, 4, 13, available at: refworld.org; Vietnam Briefing, ‘Amended Vietnamese Nationality Law: Key Updates for Foreign Workers’ (12 August 2025), available at: vietnam-briefing.com; Tân Văn Lang, ‘Vietnam Immigration Procedures for Dual Nationals in 2026’, available at: tanvanlang.com
What are the basic rights of a foreign national upon arrest or detention?
Upon arrest or detention in Vietnam, a foreign national has the following rights under domestic law:
- Information and explanation of rights: The detainee must be informed of their rights, obligations, and the internal rules of the detention facility.
- Physical integrity and dignity: Torture, coercion, corporal punishment, and any treatment infringing upon the body, health, honour, or dignity of a detained person are prohibited.
- Legal assistance: The detainee has the right to defend themselves, appoint a defence counsel, or request legal aid.
- Consular access: Foreign nationals in detention have an explicit right to consular access under the Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention, reflecting Vietnam’s obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
- Interpretation: Participants in criminal proceedings may use their own language; Vietnamese procedural authorities are required to appoint an interpreter.
- Contact with family and legal representative: The detainee has the right to meet relatives and their legal representative.
- Complaints and redress: The detainee may complain about illegal acts and has the right to compensation if held in contravention of law.
In practice, significant gaps between these formal rights and their implementation have been documented, particularly regarding access to legal counsel in national security cases and prompt notification of family members.[9]Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13, 25 November 2015) arts 8(1), 9(1), available at: vbpl.vn; Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013, art 20, available at: constitutionnet.org; Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) art 29, available at: natlex.ilo.org; Project88, ‘Torture’, available at: the88project.org; US Department of State, Vietnam 2024 Human Rights Report (Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 2025), available at: state.gov
What right does a foreign national have to contact their embassy or consulate?
Vietnam acceded to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) in 1992 and therefore bound by Article 36 consular notification and access obligations.
Consular access is addressed in multiple provisions of the Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13):
- Article 3(3) defines “consular access” as a component of the custody and temporary detention regime, placing it on the same footing as meal, accommodation, medical care, and visits from relatives.
- Article 8(4) expressly prohibits obstructing persons held in custody or temporary detention in the exercise of consular access — framing any such obstruction as an illegal act.
- Article 9(1)(d) provides that detained persons have the right to “meet their relatives, defense counsels and to have consular access.”
- Article 20(1)(d) governs temporary transfer for consular access: a foreigner may be temporarily transferred from detention to meet consular officers or contact humanitarian organisations in accordance with applicable treaties, bilateral agreements, or “for external relations reasons on a case-by-case basis.”
- Article 22(5) is the main substantive provision for foreigners: consular access must comply with treaties to which Vietnam is a party, international agreements, or specific agreements between Vietnam and the country of the detained person or humanitarian organisations. Representatives of Vietnamese diplomatic organisations or the Vietnam Red Cross may be invited to such meetings.
- Article 26(1) requires that where a foreigner dies in detention, the case-settling agency must notify the consulate and relatives.
- Article 34 provides that persons under 18 years old may have consular access at double the frequency permitted for adults.
The Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13), Article 3(2), further provides that criminal proceedings against foreign nationals shall be conducted in accordance with applicable international treaties.
The cumulative picture of these provisions is that consular access is formally recognised throughout the law — as a definitional component of the detention regime, as a protected right, and as a prohibited obstruction.
In practice, compliance is inconsistent. Extended periods of incommunicado detention are documented, particularly in national security cases. The UN Human Rights Committee, in its July 2025 Concluding Observations, called for the repeal of Article 74 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which restricts access to legal counsel in national security cases, noting that it prevents detained persons from accessing legal and procedural safeguards from the outset of detention. The US State Department has similarly noted that consular access is routinely denied in national security detentions.[10]Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13, 25 November 2015) art 9(1)(d), available at: vbpl.vn; Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) arts 3(2), 74, available at: natlex.ilo.org; US Department of State, Vietnam 2024 Human Rights Report (Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 2025), available at: state.gov; Project88, ‘Torture’, available at: the88project.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) para 33(c), available at: docs.un.org
What protections exist for foreign nationals who have no embassy, or who are stateless or a refugee?
Stateless persons
Vietnam is not a party to the 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons or the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. There is no domestic statelessness determination procedure. A stateless person detained in Vietnam therefore has no access to consular protection by definition, and no special procedural status under Vietnamese law. Their protection relies solely on the general rights available to all detained persons under the Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention and the Criminal Procedure Code — including the right to legal assistance and the right to have a humanitarian organisation contacted under Article 9.
As of December 2022, Vietnam’s government reported 26,811 registered stateless persons and persons of undetermined nationality within its territory. UNHCR has noted that the 2008 Law on Vietnamese Nationality does not provide sufficient protection against statelessness, particularly for children born to mixed-nationality parents where parents fail to agree on the child’s nationality at birth registration.
Refugees and asylum seekers
Vietnam is not a party to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees or its 1967 Protocol. There is no domestic asylum law and no national refugee status determination procedure. In practice, UNHCR conducts refugee status determination under its own mandate in Vietnam for the small number of individuals who seek international protection. UNHCR maintains a liaison presence in Vietnam, operating from its Thailand multi-country office. A person recognised as a refugee by UNHCR has no formal legal status under Vietnamese law, and UNHCR recognition does not create enforceable rights in domestic proceedings.
Refugees and asylum seekers in detention are subject to the same general detention regime as other foreign nationals. Vietnam has no non-refoulement obligation under the Refugee Convention, though the prohibition on return to a risk of torture under Article 3 of UNCAT applies as a matter of treaty obligation.[11]UNHCR, Submission to the Universal Periodic Review of Viet Nam (2022), available at: uprdoc.ohchr.org; Law on Vietnamese Nationality (Law No. 24/2008/QH12, 13 November 2008) arts 17, 22, available at: refworld.org; UNHCR, ‘Viet Nam’, available at: unhcr.org
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
Is legal representation state-provided or does a foreign national need to arrange it independently?
As a general rule, a foreign national charged with a criminal offence in Vietnam must arrange legal representation independently. The Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13) does not create a separate right to appointed counsel for foreign nationals as a category. Foreign nationality alone is not a ground for mandatory appointment of a defence lawyer — a foreign suspect’s right to defence is formally the same as that of a Vietnamese person. A foreign national may appoint a lawyer at any stage of the criminal process. Only Vietnamese-licensed lawyers and law offices may conduct criminal defence; foreign law firms operating in Vietnam are not permitted to practise criminal law or appear in criminal proceedings.
Mandatory appointment in capital cases
An important exception applies where a person faces a charge for which the maximum penalty is death. Under Article 76(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code, if an accused or defendant charged with a capital offence has not sought the assistance of defence counsel, the investigating body, procuracy, or court is obliged to request a bar association to assign a law office to appoint defence counsel. This obligation applies regardless of nationality.
Legal aid
Vietnam has a state legal aid system under the Law on Legal Aid (Law No. 11/2017/QH14). Eligible beneficiaries are defined by statute and primarily include Vietnamese citizens who are poor, ethnic minority persons, or persons with disabilities (amongst others). Foreign nationals are not among the listed eligible beneficiaries and legal aid is not routinely available to them in practice. Consular posts and diplomatic missions can assist in identifying counsel for their nationals.
In practice
The quality of state-appointed defence in capital cases has been widely criticised. Appointed counsel frequently face restricted access to clients during pre-trial detention, inadequate preparation time, and practical barriers arising from language differences. Article 74 of the Criminal Procedure Code permits investigating bodies to restrict defence counsel access in national security cases; the UN Human Rights Committee in July 2025 recommended its repeal, noting that it prevents detained persons from enjoying legal and procedural safeguards from the outset of detention. Article 173(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code additionally allows suspects accused of national security offences to be detained for an indefinite period without judicial review — a provision the Committee also flagged as requiring amendment.[12]Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) arts 72, 74, 76(2)(a), available at: natlex.ilo.org; Vietnam Law Magazine, ‘Vietnam’s criminal procedure law on criminal cases involving foreigners: ambiguities and proposed solutions’, available at: vietnamlawmagazine.vn; US Embassy Vietnam, ‘Legal Assistance’, available at: vn.usembassy.gov; Nguyen Thi Phuong and others, ‘The Changing Nature of Death Penalty in Vietnam: A Historical and Legal Inquiry’ (2019) 9(3) Societies 56, available at: mdpi.com; Law on Legal Aid (Law No. 11/2017/QH14, 20 June 2017), available at: vbpl.vn; Project88, ‘Torture’, available at: the88project.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) paras 32–33, available at: docs.un.org
Torture & Ill-Treatment
What legal protections exist against torture and ill-treatment in Vietnam?
Constitutional protection
Article 20 of the Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013 provides that everyone has the right to physical inviolability and the legal protection of their life, health, honour, and dignity, and that no one may be subjected to torture, violence, coercion, corporal punishment, or any form of treatment that harms their body or health.
Treaty obligation
Vietnam ratified the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT) on 28 November 2014. This creates binding obligations to criminalise torture, investigate allegations promptly and impartially, exclude evidence obtained through torture, and provide redress to victims. Vietnam has not ratified the Optional Protocol to UNCAT (OPCAT) and has not established a National Preventive Mechanism. The UN Human Rights Committee, in its July 2025 concluding observations, recommended that investigations be conducted in line with the Istanbul Protocol; that the burden of proof that a confession was made voluntarily rest with the prosecution; that solitary confinement be limited, subject to judicial review, and never used as punishment; and that shackling be used only when strictly necessary for safety and never as punishment or humiliation.
Criminal law
The Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13) does not contain a standalone offence of torture adopting the definition in Article 1 of UNCAT, and no single provision replicates the Convention’s requirement that official instigation or consent constitutes an element of the offence. However, torture-related conduct is criminalised across several provisions:
- Article 373 — Use of torture: applies to any person who, in the course of proceedings, trial, or implementation of measures including attendance at a correctional institution or rehabilitation centre, uses torture or brutally treats or insults another person.
- Article 374 — Obtainment of testimony by duress: criminalises the use of illegal methods to force an interrogated person to provide information in the course of proceedings. An aggravating circumstance applies where the offender uses torture, maltreats, or insults the interrogated person.
- Article 377 — abuse of position or power to illegally arrest, detain, or hold a person in custody, with an aggravating circumstance of torture or cruel treatment.
The UN Committee against Torture has noted that this framework falls short of UNCAT requirements because torture is not defined in domestic law, and because official instigation or consent is not explicitly criminalised as a standalone element of any offence.
Procedural and custodial law
- The Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13), Article 10, expressly prohibits torture and forced confession; Article 87 provides that evidence obtained through torture, coercion, or threats is inadmissible.
- The Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13), Articles 4 and 8, prohibit torture, coercion, corporal punishment, and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment as fundamental principles and as specific prohibited acts.[13]Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013, art 20, available at: constitutionnet.org; Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13), available at: ipvietnam.gov.vn; Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) arts 10, 87, available at: natlex.ilo.org; Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13, 25 November 2015) arts 4, 8, available at: vbpl.vn; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) paras 26–27, available at: docs.un.org; UN Committee against Torture, Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CAT/C/VNM/CO/1, 29 November 2018), available at: digitallibrary.un.org
What recourse is available if a foreign national has been tortured or mistreated in custody?
Several avenues exist under Vietnamese law, however, they may have limitations in practice:
- Criminal complaint. A victim may file a complaint or denunciation with the People’s Procuracy under the Law on Denunciations and the Criminal Procedure Code (Article 32). The Procuracy has supervisory authority over detention facilities and may initiate criminal proceedings against law enforcement officials. Between 2013 and 2018, Vietnam’s Supreme People’s Procuracy received 31 torture complaints; four cases of corporal punishment and forced testimony were prosecuted between 2015 and 2018. Prosecution rates are low and accountability is inconsistent.
- Complaint to the detention facility or supervisory procuracy. The Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Articles 44–55) provides a complaints procedure allowing detained persons or their representatives to complain about illegal acts by detention authorities to the supervising procuracy.
- State compensation. The Law on State Compensation Liability (Law No. 10/2017/QH14) provides a right to compensation where a person has been unlawfully detained or subjected to illegal acts by state officials. The Criminal Procedure Code (Article 31) also provides for state compensation for unlawful detention.
International mechanisms
Vietnam has ratified UNCAT but has not accepted the competence of the Committee against Torture to receive individual complaints under Article 22. The individual complaints procedure is therefore unavailable. Vietnam is subject to the UNCAT reporting cycle and to Universal Periodic Review, through which third states and NGOs may raise documented cases of torture.
Practical constraints
In practice, effective recourse is severely limited. Internal investigations are conducted by public security authorities with no independent oversight body. Reprisals against complainants and their families have been documented. The UN Human Rights Committee in July 2025 expressed concern at the absence of an independent and effective complaints mechanism for persons deprived of their liberty, and recommended that all persons in detention be guaranteed access to such a mechanism with direct access to relevant monitoring bodies and effective remedies. The exclusion of evidence obtained by torture is formally provided for in Article 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code but is not consistently applied — the Committee specifically recommended that the burden of proving a confession was voluntary rest with the prosecution, and that evidence obtained through torture never be accepted by courts[14]Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015), available at: natlex.ilo.org; Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention (Law No. 94/2015/QH13, 25 November 2015), available at: vbpl.vn; Law on State Compensation Liability (Law No. 10/2017/QH14), available at: vbpl.vn; OHCHR, ‘Committee against Torture considers the initial report of Viet Nam’ (15 November 2018), available at: ohchr.org; US Department of State, Vietnam 2024 Human Rights Report (Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 2025), available at: state.gov; Project88, ‘Torture’, available at: the88project.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) paras 26–27, 29(c), available at: docs.un.org
DEATH PENALTY
Which offences carry the death penalty in Vietnam?
With effect from 1 July 2025, the death penalty applies to ten offences under the Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13, as amended by Law No. 86/2025/QH15):
- Article 108 — High treason
- Article 112 — Rebellion (rioting)
- Article 113 — Terrorism against the people’s government
- Article 123 — Murder
- Article 142 — Rape of a person under 16 years old
- Article 248 — Illegal production of narcotic substances
- Article 251 — Illegal dealing in narcotic substances
- Article 299 — Terrorism
- Article 422 — Crimes against humanity
- Article 423 — War crimes
The death penalty is discretionary across all ten offences — it applies only to the most serious cases and is not mandatory. Sentencing courts must consider the nature, gravity, and individual circumstances of the offence.
Legislative context
The 2025 amendment removed eight formerly capital offences: activities against the government (Article 109), espionage (Article 110), sabotage of national security infrastructure (Article 114), manufacturing counterfeit medicines (Article 194), illegal drug transport (Article 250), embezzlement (Article 353), accepting bribes (Article 354), and waging a war of aggression (Article 421). Persons already sentenced to death for these offences had their sentences converted to life imprisonment by operation of law.
Drug-related offences
Two of the ten remaining capital offences — illegal production (Article 248) and illegal dealing (Article 251) in narcotic substances — are drug-related. The Human Rights Committee, in its July 2025 concluding observations on Vietnam, noted that drug-related offences do not meet the threshold of “most serious crimes” within the meaning of Article 6 of the ICCPR, and called on Vietnam to refrain from imposing the death penalty for such offences.[15]Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015, as amended by Law No. 86/2025/QH15, 25 June 2025) arts 108, 112, 113, 123, 142, 248, 251, 299, 422, 423; International Bar Association Human Rights Institute, ‘IBAHRI welcomes reduction in scope of death penalty and calls for full abolition’ (2025), available at: ibanet.org; Death Penalty Information Center, ‘Vietnam Eliminates Death Penalty for Eight Offenses’ (1 July 2025), available at: deathpenaltyinfo.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) paras 22–23, available at: docs.un.org
What additional protections apply to a foreign national facing a capital charge?
Persons excluded from the death penalty
Two distinct protections apply under Article 40 of the Criminal Code.
First, the death penalty may not be imposed on juvenile offenders, pregnant women, women nursing children under 36 months old at the time of the offence or during trial, or persons aged 75 or over at the time of the offence or during trial. These persons may receive a maximum of life imprisonment.
Second, even where a death sentence has already been imposed, it will not be executed where the convicted person is pregnant or nursing a child under 36 months, or is aged 75 or over. Additionally, for persons convicted of embezzlement or accepting bribes, execution will not proceed where the convicted person has returned at least one third of the assets concerned and has closely cooperated with authorities or made efforts at reparation. In all such cases the sentence is commuted to life imprisonment by operation of law.
Mandatory defence counsel
Where a person facing a capital charge has not appointed defence counsel, the investigating body, procuracy, or court must arrange for a lawyer to be appointed under the Criminal Procedure Code. This applies regardless of nationality.
Fair trial and international mechanisms
Vietnam’s ICCPR obligations require strict compliance with all fair trial guarantees in Article 14 in capital cases. The UN Human Rights Committee in July 2025 expressed concern about the lack of due process in capital proceedings and called for transparent, effective review procedures for newly discovered exculpatory evidence. Vietnam has not ratified the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR and has not accepted Article 22 of UNCAT, so neither individual complaints mechanism is available.[16]Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13, as amended by Law No. 86/2025/QH15), available at: ipvietnam.gov.vn; Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) art 76(2)(a), available at: natlex.ilo.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) paras 23(b)–(c), available at: docs.un.org
Can evidence or documentation from a foreign national’s home country be submitted in proceedings?
The Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13) establishes an adversarial framework under which the defence has the right to collect and submit evidence at any stage of proceedings. Article 60(2) provides that defendants may present evidence, documents, and objects and request competent authorities to examine and verify them. The court is obliged to consider all evidence of both guilt and innocence.
Validity of evidence obtained through international cooperation
Article 494 of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly provides that documents and items obtained through international judicial cooperation in criminal matters are to be treated as evidence. This is the primary legal basis for the admission of materials sourced from abroad. The channel through which such materials are formally obtained is mutual legal assistance — Vietnam has concluded mutual legal assistance agreements in criminal matters with a number of states, and international cooperation requests are processed by the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice. Where no treaty exists, the principle of reciprocity applies.
Authentication requirements
For foreign-issued documents to have legal validity in proceedings, they must be authenticated under Vietnamese law. Until 11 September 2026, the applicable procedure is consular legalisation: documents must be certified by the competent authority of the issuing country and then legalised by a Vietnamese diplomatic mission abroad, or by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Vietnam. They must also be translated into Vietnamese by a certified translator and the translation notarised.
Vietnam acceded to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (Apostille Convention) on 31 December 2025. The Convention will enter into force for Vietnam on 11 September 2026. From that date, apostilled public documents from Convention member states will be accepted in Vietnam without consular legalisation, significantly simplifying the process. Until that date, the traditional legalisation chain remains in force.[17]Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) arts 60(2), 494, 495, available at: natlex.ilo.org; Hague Conference on Private International Law, ‘Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents — accession of Vietnam’ (14 January 2026), entry into force 11 September 2026, available at: hcch.net; Decree No. 111/2011/ND-CP on consular certification and consular legalisation (as amended by Decree No. 196/2025/ND-CP)
What pardon or clemency mechanisms are available?
The State President’s clemency power derives from Article 88 of the Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013, which vests in the President the power to grant pardons and, on the basis of National Assembly resolutions, to proclaim a general amnesty.
The individual clemency petition
The procedural framework for individual clemency in capital cases is set out in Article 367 of the Criminal Procedure Code. After a death sentence becomes legally effective, the files are sent to the President of the Supreme People’s Court and the Chairman of the Supreme People’s Procuracy, who have two months to decide whether to challenge the judgment. If the judgment is confirmed, the condemned has seven days to petition the State President for commutation. Execution may not proceed until the State President has formally rejected the petition. Commutation to life imprisonment is the only possible outcome of a successful petition. Under Article 40(4) of the Penal Code, where a commuted sentence derives from the conditions in Article 40(3), the convict may not be considered for their first sentence reduction until they have served a life sentence (25 years).
General amnesty
The State President may also proclaim a general amnesty, typically on national holidays, commuting the sentences of groups of death row prisoners. In 2022, four of 31 prisoners whose sentences were commuted by general amnesty were foreign nationals. General amnesties are not subject to published criteria and cannot be petitioned for directly.
Automatic commutation — distinct from clemency
The Article 40(3) mechanism, under which the death sentence is not executed by operation of law in defined circumstances, is separate from the clemency petition and does not pass through the President. See Q9 above.
Practice and transparency
Vietnam does not publish data on clemency petitions, grants, or rejections, and all such information is classified as a state secret. Based on available research, foreign nationals — particularly those from abolitionist states with which Vietnam maintains good relations — are among the groups most likely to receive commutation. Other documented factors include cooperation with police investigations and sustained international diplomatic engagement. The UN Human Rights Committee in July 2025 recommended that Vietnam develop comprehensive, transparent rules for the submission and review of clemency petitions, aligned with international standards and ensuring due process, certainty, and objectivity.[18]Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2013, art 88, available at: constitutionnet.org; Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 101/2015/QH13, 27 November 2015) art 367, available at: natlex.ilo.org; Criminal Code (Law No. 100/2015/QH13, as amended) arts 40(3), 40(4), available at: ipvietnam.gov.vn; Daniel Pascoe, Clemency Procedures in East and Southeast Asia (ADPAN 2021) 171–185; Radio Free Asia, ‘Critics dismiss Vietnam’s clemency for death row inmates as “progress”‘ (9 February 2024), available at: rfa.org; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Viet Nam (UN Doc CCPR/C/VNM/CO/4, 15 July 2025) para 23(b), available at: docs.un.org
Repatriation
Under what conditions can a foreign national apply to serve their sentence in their home country?
Vietnam has historically lacked a standalone domestic framework for prisoner transfer. This changes on 1 July 2026, when the Law on the Transfer of Persons Serving Prison Sentences — passed by the National Assembly on 26 November 2025 — enters into force. Until that date, transfer requests are governed by the general provisions in Chapter V of the Law on Legal Assistance (2007), and in practice depend on the existence of a bilateral agreement between Vietnam and the home country.
Conditions for transfer
Under the new Law, a foreign national imprisoned in Vietnam may apply to serve the remainder of their sentence in their home country where all of the following conditions are met:
- Nationality or residency: The person must be a citizen of the receiving country, a permanent resident, or otherwise accepted by that country.
- Dual criminality: The offence must constitute a criminal offence under the laws of both Vietnam and the receiving country.
- Minimum remaining sentence: The person must have at least one year of their sentence remaining at the time of the transfer request. In special cases as specified by the Government, this threshold may be reduced to six months.
- Final conviction: The conviction must be final, with all appeals exhausted.
- Consent: Both the Vietnamese authorities and the authorities of the receiving country must consent. The person subject to transfer must also consent, or — where they lack full legal capacity — their lawful representative must do so on their behalf.
Bilateral agreements: In practice, a transfer can only proceed where a bilateral prisoner transfer agreement exists between Vietnam and the home country. Vietnam has entered into such agreements with a number of countries, including Australia (2008), the United Kingdom (2009), India (2013), Thailand (2010), and South Korea (2009). Where no bilateral agreement is in place, repatriation depends on ad hoc diplomatic negotiation, which is typically lengthy and uncertain.
Note for practitioners: Until 1 July 2026, transfer requests should be made under the existing Law on Legal Assistance framework, engaging the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs through diplomatic channels with reference to any applicable bilateral agreement.[19]Ministry of Public Security (Vietnam), ‘NA Adopts Law on Transfer of Sentenced Persons’ (27 November 2025), available at: en.bocongan.gov.vn; Ministry of Public Security (Vietnam), ‘Draft Law Finalized to Humanize Legal Framework on Transfer of Persons Serving Prison Sentences’, Vietnam Law Magazine (November 2025), available at: vietnamlawmagazine.vn; Ministry of Public Security (Vietnam), ‘Vietnam, Australia Strengthen Cooperation in Extradition and Transfer of Sentenced Persons’ (12 December 2025), available at: en.bocongan.gov.vn; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, ‘Information Pack for British Prisoners in Vietnam’ (updated February 2025), available at: gov.uk; Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and the Kingdom of Thailand on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, available at: lanhsuvietnam.gov.vn; Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and the Republic of Korea on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, available at: lanhsuvietnam.gov.vn
Rights Matrix
Foreign nationals imprisoned in Vietnam face distinct vulnerabilities that require enhanced legal protections beyond those afforded to Vietnamese nationals. The following table outlines the specific rights available to foreign nationals imprisoned in Vietnam under both international and domestic law, highlighting where protections exist and where critical gaps remain.
Note: Vietnam has ratified the ICCPR and UNCAT. Where Vietnam has not ratified a specific instrument (such as the ICCPR Second Optional Protocol or OPCAT), those instruments are cited as instructive of international standards rather than binding obligations.
| Right | International Law | Domestic Law |
|---|---|---|
| Right to be informed of rights upon arrest or detention | ICCPR, Article 9(2); Body of Principles, Principle 13 | Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention 2015 |
| Right to physical integrity and freedom from torture, violence, and degrading treatment | ICCPR Article 7; UNCAT, Articles 2, 4, 16; Mandela Rules, Rules 1, 43 | Constitution 2013; Criminal Code 2015; Criminal Procedure Code 2015; Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention 2015 |
| Right to consular notification and access | VCCR 1963, Article 36; Body of Principles, Principle 16(2); Mandela Rules, Rule 62 | Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention 2015; Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to interpretation and language access | ICCPR, Article 14(3)(a), (f); Mandela Rules, Rule 61 | Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to legal assistance and defence counsel | ICCPR, Article 14(3)(b), (d); Body of Principles, Principle 17 | Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to contact family | ICCPR, Article 17; Body of Principles, Principle 19; Mandela Rules, Rule 58 | Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention 2015 |
| Right to exclude evidence obtained by torture | UNCAT, Article 15; ICCPR, Article 14(3)(g) | Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to complain about ill-treatment and seek redress | UNCAT, Articles 13, 14; ICCPR, Article 2(3); Body of Principles, Principle 33 | Law on Enforcement of Custody and Temporary Detention 2015; Law on State Compensation Liability 2017; Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to submit evidence in criminal proceedings | ICCPR Article 14(3)(e) | Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to clemency or pardon | ICCPR, Article 6(4); General Comment No. 36 | Constitution 2013; Criminal Procedure Code 2015 |
| Right to protection from execution in defined circumstances | ICCP Article 6(5) | Criminal Code 2015 |
| Right to serve sentence in home country (prisoner transfer) | UN Model Agreement (GA Res 40/32 1985) | Law on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons 2025 (in force 1 July 2026); Law on Legal Assistance 2007 |
| Right to independent oversight of detention | OPCAT (not ratified); Mandela Rules, Rule 83 | No domestic framework. Vietnam has no independent national preventive mechanism |
