DETAINED ABROAD

Rights and resources for foreign nationals imprisoned overseas: death penalty, torture, and consular protection

Foreign nationals imprisoned across the Indo-Pacific face acute vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. Unfamiliar laws, language barriers, and inadequate legal representation leave them disproportionately exposed to the risk of torture and ill-treatment in custody, and to the application of the death penalty. These risks are compounded when consular access is denied or delayed. Without timely notification of their right to embassy or consulate support, foreign nationals may unknowingly waive critical legal protections, face trial without adequate representation, and remain unaccounted for to their families for months or years.

Detained Abroad is a free legal resource that maps the rights of foreign nationals who are imprisoned, facing the death penalty, or at risk of torture across the Indo-Pacific region. For each country, it examines the applicable domestic legal framework, identifies where it falls short of international standards, and sets out the protections and remedies available in practice, including the procedures that allow foreign nationals to serve their sentences in their home country.

For a consolidated overview of the international legal standards referenced across this site, see the International Legal Framework page.

Bangladesh

Death Penalty

Status:
Retentionist (Last known execution: 2023; Executions in 2024: 0 – first year without executions since 2018)[1]Amnesty International, Death Sentences and Executions 2024 (April 2025) 21 https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/8976/2025/en/
Domestic legislation:
33 offences punishable by death[2]Odhikar, ‘Information on the Imposition of the Death Penalty and its Impact in Bangladesh’ (Replies to the questionnaire of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, May 2022) https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/odhikar_replies-dp.pdf

International obligations:

ICCPR

Ratified

ICCPR 2nd Protocol

Not Ratified

Torture & Ill-Treatment

Domestic legislation:

Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention) Act 2013

Constitutional protection under Article 35(5) (prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment)

International obligations:

UNCAT

Ratified

OPCAT

Ratified

NPM

Not Fully Constituted

Imprisoned Foreign Nationals

imprisoned:
419*of whom 58 convicted; 208 under trial (November 2025) [3]‘419 Foreigners in Bangladesh Jails’ New Age Bangladesh (16 November 2025) https://www.newagebd.net/post/country/282266/419-foreigners-in-jails
On Death row:
N/A*No verified figure available

International obligations:

Vienna Convention

Ratified (1978)

Domestic

No dedicated domestic legislation implementing VCCR Article 36

Fair trial protections are derived from the Constitution of Bangladesh 1972 and Code of Criminal Procedure 1898

Situation Overview

2,400+

ON DEATH ROW

Expanding Capital Punishment

At least 165 new death sentences were issued in 2024, including for non-lethal offences like drug crimes and rape. Over 2,400 people remained on death row at the end of 2024.[4]Amnesty International, Death Sentences and Executions 2024 (April 2025) https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/8976/2025/en/; European Union Agency for Asylum, Bangladesh: Country Focus (August 2025) https://www.euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/2025-08/2025_08_COI_Report_Bangladesh_Country_Focus_EN.pdf

Read more…High death sentencing rate, including for non-lethal offences: At least 165 new death sentences were recorded in 2024, including for drug offences and rape. Over 2,400 people were on death row at the end of 2024. See also: Amnesty International, ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2024’ (April 2025).

390

SENTENCED TO DEATH IN 2023

Narcotics Control Act 2018

The death penalty is used extensively for non-violent drug crimes. In May 2024, a Botswana national was sentenced to death for heroin possession at Dhaka’s international airport.[5]FIDH and others, ‘Bangladesh: Government Must Work Towards Abolishing the Death Penalty’ (5 June 2024). https://www.fidh.org/en/region/asia/bangladesh/bangladesh-government-must-work-towards-abolishing-the-death-penalty; Narcotics Control Act 2018 (Bangladesh). https://legislativediv.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/legislativediv.portal.gov.bd/page/5a6bca14_6a2e_44e4_b155_c8147d1edd65/27.%20Narcotics%20Control%20Act%2C%202018.pdf

Read more…The death penalty is applied extensively for drug offences: The Narcotics Control Act 2018 introduced the death penalty for several non-violent drug offences. In 2023, at least 390 persons were sentenced to death and five executions were carried out; a further 111 death sentences were imposed in the first three months of 2024 alone. In May 2024, a Botswana national (Lesedi Molapisi) was sentenced to death after being found in possession of heroin at Dhaka’s international airport. See also: Odhikar, ‘Three-month Human Rights Report: January – March 2024’ (April 2024); Amnesty International, ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2023’ (May 2024).

5

SENTENCED IN ABSENCE

Breach of Standards

Death sentences are frequently imposed in proceedings that fail international standards. In 2024, five people were sentenced to death without being present in court.[6]Amnesty International, Death Sentences and Executions 2024 (April 2025) https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/8976/2025/en/

Read more…Death sentences imposed in absentia and in breach of fair trial standards: Amnesty International has documented death sentences imposed in proceedings that did not meet international fair trial standards, including trials conducted in the defendant’s absence. Five of the 165 death sentences recorded in 2024 were imposed without the defendant present. See: Amnesty International, ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2024’ (April 2025); see also the death sentence imposed in absentia against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina by the International Crimes Tribunal in November 2025.

83

PRISON DEATHS

Systemic Misconduct

Torture during remand is consistently reported, often during questioning without a lawyer. Odhikar recorded 83 deaths in prison in 2024; victims reporting abuse face harassment.[7]Death Penalty Project, Living Under Sentence of Death: Bangladesh (2021). https://www.deathpenaltyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DPP-Bangladesh-Report-Web-single.pdf; Odhikar, Annual Human Rights Report 2024 (10 February 2025); United States Department of State, 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bangladesh (2025). https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/bangladesh

Read more…Torture and custodial abuse are well-documented: Torture during remand is consistently reported, with questioning permitted without a lawyer present. Odhikar recorded 83 deaths in prison in 2024. Victims who have filed complaints have faced harassment and threats. See: Odhikar, ‘Annual Human Rights Report 2024’ (February 2025); United States Department of State, ‘2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bangladesh’ (2025).

183%

OCCUPANCY RATE

Pre-Trial Detention Crisis

Prisons hold 78,894 inmates against a capacity of 43,157. Over 73% of the total prison population consists of pre-trial detainees awaiting their day in court.[8]World Prison Brief, ‘Bangladesh’ (29 November 2025). https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/bangladesh; European Union Agency for Asylum, Bangladesh: Country Focus (August 2025). https://www.euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/2025-08/2025_08_COI_Report_Bangladesh_Country_Focus_EN.pdf

Read more…Severe prison overcrowding: As of November 2025, Bangladesh’s prisons held 78,894 prisoners against an official capacity of 43,157 — an occupancy rate of approximately 183%. Over 73.1% of prisoners are pre-trial detainees. See: World Prison Brief, ‘Bangladesh’ (November 2025); European Union Agency for Asylum, ‘Bangladesh: Country Focus’ (August 2025).

152

BEYOND SENTENCE

Repatriation Delays

Of the 419 foreign nationals imprisoned, 152 remain detained despite having completed their sentences. Most are from India, followed by Pakistan, Myanmar, and Nigeria.[9]‘419 Foreigners in Bangladesh Jails’ New Age Bangladesh (16 November 2025). https://www.newagebd.net/post/country/282266/419-foreigners-in-jails

Read more…Foreign nationals detained beyond sentence completion: Of 419 foreign nationals in Bangladeshi prisons as of November 2025, 152 had completed their sentences but remained detained pending repatriation. These include citizens of India, Pakistan, Myanmar, and Nigeria, with Indians constituting the majority. See: ‘419 Foreigners in Bangladesh Jails’ New Age Bangladesh (16 November 2025); Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS), ‘157 foreign nationals waiting to be repatriated after serving jail terms’ (updated data as of November 2025).

Legal Framework in Practice

Detention & Identity

Who qualifies as a foreign national under the law of Bangladesh?

Under the Foreigners Act 1946, a “foreigner” is defined simply as “a person who is not a citizen of Bangladesh”. The Act confers broad powers on the government to regulate, restrict, and detain non-citizens.

  • Burden of Proof: If a person’s status as a foreigner is in question during any legal proceeding under the Act, the onus of proving that they are not a foreigner lies upon that person.
  • Registration: The Registration of Foreigners Act 1939 requires non-citizens to report their presence, movements, and departure to prescribed authorities. Failure to comply can result in up to one year of imprisonment.[10]Foreigners Act 1946 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-details-216.html; Registration of Foreigners Act 1939 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-details-182.html

What are the basic rights of a foreign national upon arrest or detention?

The Constitution of Bangladesh 1972 extends its fundamental rights protections to all persons, not only citizens. The following provisions apply to foreign nationals upon arrest or detention:

  • Article 31 — the right to be treated in accordance with law, applying to all persons within Bangladesh.
  • Article 32 — the right to life and personal liberty; no person shall be deprived of these except in accordance with law.
  • Article 33 — safeguards as to arrest and detention: the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest as soon as possible; the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice; and the right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest. Detention beyond 24 hours requires a magistrate’s authorisation.
  • Article 35(3) — the right to a speedy and public trial.
  • Article 35(5) — prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

The Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 provides the procedural framework governing arrest, remand, and pre-trial detention.

In practice, these rights are frequently not observed. The OHCHR Fact-Finding Team documented widespread failure to inform detainees of the grounds for their arrest, to bring them before a magistrate within 24 hours, and to allow access to a lawyer. Remand is routinely granted by courts with little scrutiny of the evidence.[11]Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 1972, arts 31, 32, 33, 35. http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html; Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-75.html; UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report of the Fact-Finding Team on Bangladesh (2024). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-fact-finding-report-human-rights-violations-and-abuses-related

What right does a foreign national have to contact their embassy or consulate?

Bangladesh acceded to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) by succession in 1978 and is therefore bound by Article 36. Under this provision, a foreign national who is arrested or detained must be informed without delay of their right to have their embassy or consulate notified. If they request it, the relevant consular post must be notified without delay. Consular officers must be permitted to visit, communicate with, and arrange legal representation for their national.

There is no domestic legislation implementing Article 36 obligations. Consequently, there is no statutory duty on police or prison authorities to notify a foreign national’s embassy upon arrest, and no standardised policy governing consular access. Whether a foreign national is informed of this right in practice depends entirely on the conduct of arresting or prison officers.[12]Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (adopted 24 April 1963, entered into force 19 March 1967), art 36. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_2_1963.pdf

What protections exist for foreign nationals who have no embassy, or who are stateless or a refugee?

Bangladesh is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or its 1967 Protocol and has no domestic asylum or refugee law. Refugees, asylum seekers, and stateless persons are treated as foreign nationals under the Foreigners Act 1946, with no distinct legal status or additional domestic protections. However, Article 31 of the Constitution guarantees the “protection of the law” to “every other person for the time being within Bangladesh,” which the Supreme Court has interpreted to include refugees and stateless persons.

In practice, this situation most acutely affects the Rohingya population: over 1 million Rohingya refugees live in a “legal vacuum” without formal refugee status. Human Rights Watch and Fortify Rights have documented police abuse of Rohingya detainees in the camps, including arbitrary arrest, torture, and sexual violence.[13]Human Rights Watch, ‘Bangladesh: Rampant Police Abuse of Rohingya Refugees’ (17 January 2023). https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/01/17/bangladesh-rampant-police-abuse-rohingya-refugees; Fortify Rights, ‘I May Be Killed Any Moment’ (March 2025). https://www.fortifyrights.org/bgd-inv-rep-2025-03-18/; European Union Agency for Asylum, Bangladesh: Country Focus (August 2025). https://www.euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/2025-08/2025_08_COI_Report_Bangladesh_Country_Focus_EN.pdf

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Is legal representation state-provided or does a foreign national need to arrange it independently?

Under Article 33(1) of the Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, every person arrested has the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice. A foreign national may arrange private representation at their own cost. Where they cannot afford to do so, state-funded legal aid is available through the National Legal Aid Services Organization (NLASO), established under the Legal Aid Services Act 2000. NLASO operates at district level across Bangladesh and provides government-funded legal assistance to indigent accused persons. The organisation also operates a legal aid helpline for underprivileged litigants.

Non-governmental legal aid is also available through organisations such as the Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) and Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK), which provides free legal services to those unable to afford representation.

Crucially, if a defendant (citizen or foreigner) faces a death sentence and does not have a lawyer, the state is legally required to appoint a lawyer at the government’s expense during the trial and the subsequent “Death Reference” hearing at the High Court[14]Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 1972, art 33(1). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html; Legal Aid Services Act 2000. https://moulvibazar.judiciary.gov.bd/en/menu/page/the-legal-aid-act; National Legal Aid Services Organization, ‘Services of Government Legal Aid’ (17 March 2025). https://nlaso.gov.bd/site/page/68c74afb-a524-47a1-b5b7-e94772f37769/; Supreme Court of Bangladesh (High Court Division) Rules, 1973. https://library.bcsadminacademy.gov.bd/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=1277&shelfbrowse_itemnumber=7370

Torture & Ill-Treatment

What legal protections exist against torture and ill-treatment in Bangladesh?

Bangladesh has both constitutional and statutory protections against torture, though significant gaps exist in their scope and implementation.

Constitutional protection

Article 35(5) of the Constitution of Bangladesh 1972 prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. This is an absolute prohibition and applies to all persons in custody regardless of nationality.

Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013

This Act criminalises torture and custodial death by public officials. Key provisions include:

  • Torture and custodial death are criminal offences.
  • Any confession or statement obtained through torture is inadmissible as evidence.
  • Victims have a right to compensation.

The Act has significant limitations that fall short of international standards under UNCAT:

  • Mental suffering is not covered — the definition of torture is restricted to physical pain, excluding psychological suffering in violation of UNCAT Article 1 and ICCPR Article 7.
  • No independent investigation mechanism — complaints are investigated by police, who investigate themselves. The Code of Criminal Procedure (Article 132) further requires government sanction before prosecuting public officials, creating a structural barrier to accountability.
  • Impunity is pervasive. Since the Act was passed in 2013, at least 103 detainees were reportedly tortured to death. The government reported only 24 cases filed under the Act, with a conviction in only one. The UN Committee against Torture has expressed concern about the widespread and routine commission of torture by law enforcement to extract confessions.

International obligations

Bangladesh ratified UNCAT in 1998 and the OPCAT in 2025. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has been designated as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) under the National Human Rights Commission Ordinance 2025, but it is not yet fully constituted.

The NHRC has itself been found non-compliant with the Paris Principles — its members under the former government were not independent, and it lacks the power to investigate violations by law enforcement agencies.[15]Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 1972, art 35(5). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html; Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013 (Bangladesh). http://www.humanrights.asia/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Torture-CustodialDeath-ActNo50of2013-English.pdf; UN Committee against Torture, ‘Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Bangladesh’ (2019) UN Doc CAT/C/BGD/CO/1, para 7; UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Report of the Fact-Finding Team on Bangladesh’ (2024) paras 319–321. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc6021auv-report-fact-finding-team-bangladesh; UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, ‘UN Torture Prevention Body Announces 2026 Visit Plan’ (OHCHR Press Release, 14 November 2025). https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/11/un-torture-prevention-body-announces-2026-visit-plan-liquidity-challenges

What recourse is available if a foreign national has been tortured or mistreated in custody?

In principle, several avenues exist. In practice, all face serious structural obstacles.

Criminal complaint under the 2013 Act

A victim may file a complaint alleging torture or custodial abuse before the police or directly to a Court of Sessions Judge. If the Court is satisfied, it shall order a judicial investigation and must record the statement immediately and direct a registered medical doctor to examine the person for  injuries within 24 hours.

Prosecution of public officials additionally requires prior government sanction under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Victims and complainants have faced harassment, intimidation, and counter-charges as a result of coming forward, a pattern documented by the US State Department and human rights organisations.

Constitutional petition (writ jurisdiction)

A person in custody may apply to the High Court Division of the Supreme Court for relief under the Constitution’s writ jurisdiction. The High Court can issue directions to prevent unlawful detention or abuse. In practice, access to this remedy is constrained by cost, language barriers, and the difficulty of filing from custody.

National Human Rights Commission

The NHRC may receive complaints of human rights violations. However, as noted above, it lacks the power to investigate law enforcement agencies and has historically lacked independence.

Consular channel

A foreign national’s consulate (if notified of their detention) may raise concerns about treatment directly with authorities and document evidence of abuse. Consular engagement is often the most practically accessible route for foreign nationals, but depends entirely on the consulate having been notified in the first place.[16]Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013 (Bangladesh). http://www.humanrights.asia/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Torture-CustodialDeath-ActNo50of2013-English.pdf; United States Department of State, ‘2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bangladesh’ (2025). https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/bangladesh; UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Report of the Fact-Finding Team on Bangladesh’ (2024). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-fact-finding-report-human-rights-violations-and-abuses-related; Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Bangladesh), art 132. http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-75.html

DEATH PENALTY

Which offences carry the death penalty in Bangladesh?

Bangladesh retains the death penalty and continued to impose death sentences in 2024. Capital punishment applies to 33 offences under Bangladeshi law, including several non-lethal crimes. Key categories include:

    • Murder and aggravated murder — under the Penal Code 1860
    • Rape — including gang rape; certain rape offences carry a mandatory death sentence following 2020 amendments
    • Terrorism offences — under the Anti-Terrorism Act 2009
    • War crimes and crimes against humanity — under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973, as amended
    • Drug trafficking — certain offences under the Narcotics Control Act 1990
    • Kidnapping — where the victim is killed or where ransom is demanded and murder follows
    • Arson causing death
    • Enforced Disappearance Ordinance (2025) — Recently introduced by the Interim Government, allowing the death penalty for enforced disappearances.

The death penalty is not mandatory for most offences — courts retain discretion to impose life imprisonment as an alternative — with the exception of certain rape offences following the 2020 amendment to the Women and Children Repression Prevention Act, which introduced a mandatory death penalty for gang rape. Amnesty International has noted that in 2024, at least 165 death sentences were imposed, including for three drug-related offences, twelve rape cases, and the remainder for intentional killings. Odhikar recorded 307 death sentences in lower courts in the same year.[17]Penal Code 1860 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-11.html; Women and Children Repression Prevention Act 2000 (Bangladesh), as amended 2020; Narcotics Control Act 1990 (Bangladesh); Odhikar, ‘Annual Human Rights Report 2024’ (10 February 2025) 42; Amnesty International, ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2024’ (8 April 2025). https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/8976/2025/en/; European Union Agency for Asylum, ‘Bangladesh: Country Focus’ (August 2025). https://www.euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/2025-08/2025_08_COI_Report_Bangladesh_Country_Focus_EN.pdf

What additional protections apply to a foreign national facing a capital charge?

The general procedural safeguards applicable to all capital accused under Bangladeshi law include the right to appeal a death sentence to the High Court Division of the Supreme Court, followed by a further appeal to the Appellate Division. A death sentence imposed by a Sessions Court must be confirmed by the High Court Division before it can be carried into effect — this mandatory confirmation process provides an automatic layer of appellate review. In May 2024, the High Court of Dhaka additionally ruled that keeping death row inmates in solitary confinement before they have exhausted their appeals is unconstitutional.

Additionally, there are specific legal and statutory bars that prevent the imposition or execution of the death sentence for certain categories of individuals:

  • Children (Minors): Under the Children Act 2013, there is an absolute bar on sentencing anyone to death who was a child (under the age of 18) at the time the offence was committed.
  • Pregnant Women: Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the High Court Division must order the execution of a death sentence to be postponed if a woman is found to be pregnant.
  • Mental Incapacity (Unsoundness of Mind): Under the Penal Code 1860, nothing is an offence if committed by a person who, at the time of the act, was “incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law” due to unsoundness of mind.

In practice, fair trial standards in capital cases are consistently not met. Amnesty International documented in 2024 that death sentences were imposed in proceedings that did not meet international fair trial standards, and some were imposed in absentia. The OHCHR Fact-Finding Team found the judiciary to be underfunded, subject to political pressure, and prone to corruption.[18]The Children Act 2013 (Bangladesh); Penal Code 1860 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-11.html; Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-75.html; ‘BD court limits solitary confinement for death row inmates’ The News International (14 May 2024). https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1188815-bd-court-limits-solitary-confinement-for-death-row-inmate; Amnesty International, ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2024’ (8 April 2025). https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/8976/2025/en/; UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Report of the Fact-Finding Team on Bangladesh’ (2024). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-fact-finding-report-human-rights-violations-and-abuses-related

Can evidence or documentation from a foreign national’s home country be submitted in proceedings?

Yes, provided that documents meet the evidentiary standards set by the Evidence Act 1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (CrPC), both of which remain in force in Bangladesh.

Documentary evidence from abroad

Foreign public documents (such as birth certificates, court records, medical records, or character references) are admissible as secondary evidence under the Evidence Act 1872. The mode of proof depends on the document type:

  • Foreign judicial records (section 86): A court may presume a certified copy of a foreign judicial record to be genuine and accurate, provided the copy is certified in a manner confirmed by a representative of Bangladesh’s government in that country to be the customary certification method used there.
  • Other foreign public documents (section 78(6)): Documents must be proved either by the original, or by a copy certified by its legal custodian, accompanied by a certificate — under the seal of a notary public, or of a Bangladesh Consul or diplomatic agent — that the copy is duly certified by the officer with lawful custody of the original. Proof of the character of the document according to the law of the foreign country is also required.

This makes the consulate a critical intermediary: in practice, the Bangladesh consulate or embassy in the home country must certify or attest the documents to establish their admissibility.

Witness evidence from abroad

Under section 503 of the CrPC, where a witness is located outside Bangladesh and their attendance cannot be procured without unreasonable delay or expense, a court — including a Sessions Court — may issue a commission to take that witness’s evidence abroad. Where the witness resides in a Commonwealth country or Burma, and a reciprocal arrangement exists, the commission may be directed to the relevant court or judge in that country. In other cases, the commission is typically executed through the local consulate or a designated foreign authority. Parties may submit written interrogatories and cross-examine the witness through this procedure (section 505 CrPC). The testimony, once returned, becomes part of the case record and may be used as evidence.[19]Evidence Act 1872 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-24.html; Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Bangladesh). http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-75.html

What pardon or clemency mechanisms are available?

Article 49 of the Constitution of Bangladesh 1972 vests the President with the power to grant pardons, reprieves, and respites, and to remit, suspend, or commute any sentence passed by any court. This power applies to all convicted persons, including foreign nationals. There is no separate constitutional provision excluding any category of offence from clemency consideration. There is no publicly available standardised procedure setting out the criteria for assessment, the timelines for decision, or the right to reasons if a petition is refused.

The UN Human Rights Committee, in its 2017 Concluding Observations on Bangladesh, expressed concern about the lack of transparency and procedural safeguards in the clemency process. Consular involvement in supporting a mercy petition, including gathering character evidence, medical assessments, and documentation of mitigating factors from the home country, is therefore particularly important, as there is no formal mechanism requiring such matters to be considered.[20]Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 1972, art 49. http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html; UN Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Bangladesh’ (2017) UN Doc CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/concluding-observations/concluding-observations-initial-report-bangladesh

Repatriation

Under what conditions can a foreign national apply to serve their sentence in their home country?

Bangladesh does not have a general domestic statute governing prisoner repatriation. The availability of prisoner transfer therefore depends entirely on whether Bangladesh has entered into a bilateral Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TSP) agreement with the foreign national’s home country.

Existing bilateral agreements: Bangladesh has signed a small number of bilateral TSP agreements. A Bangladesh–India Agreement on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons was signed in January 2010, and transfers have taken place under it, though implementation has been slow and the numbers transferred remain low. Proposals for TSP agreements from other countries have been reported as under consideration by the Bangladesh government, though the status of these is unconfirmed.

Where no TSP agreement exists between Bangladesh and the foreign national’s home country, there is no formal legal mechanism for transfer. Repatriation in such cases can only occur through diplomatic negotiation on an ad hoc basis, which is typically slow and uncertain.[21]Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Government of the Republic of India on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (signed January 2010). https://www.mea.gov.in/TreatyDetail.htm?556; see also: UN Model Agreement on the Transfer of Foreign Prisoners and Recommendations on the Treatment of Foreign Prisoners. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/97152?ln=en

Rights Matrix

Foreign nationals imprisoned in Bangladesh face distinct vulnerabilities that require enhanced legal protections beyond those afforded to Bangladeshi nationals. The following table outlines the specific rights available to foreign nationals imprisoned in Bangladesh under both international and domestic law, highlighting where protections exist and where critical gaps remain.

RightInternational LawDomestic Law
Protection from arbitrary arrest and detentionICCPR, Arts 9, 10Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 33
Right to be produced before a judicial authority within 24 hoursICCPR, Art 9(3)Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 33(2);
Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, s 61
Right to consular notification upon arrestVCCR 1963, Art 36;
Body of Principles, Principle 16(2)
VCCR 1963, Art 36 (binding as State Party).
No domestic statute implements Art 36
Right to consular access and legal assistanceVCCR 1963 Art 36VCCR 1963, Art 36 (binding as State Party).
No domestic implementing legislation
Right to legal representationICCPR Art 14(3)(d)Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 33(1);
Legal Aid Services Act 2000
Right to an interpreterICCPR Art 14(3)(f)Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, s 360;
Evidence Act 1872, s 78(6).
No provision guaranteeing interpretation at all stages for foreign nationals
Right to humane conditions of detentionNelson Mandela Rules (UN Standard Minimum Rules 2015);
ICCPR, Art 10(1)
Prisons Act 1894
Protection from torture and ill-treatmentUNCAT, Arts 1, 16;
ICCPR, Art 7
Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 35(5);
Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013
Inadmissibility of confessions obtained by tortureUNCAT Art 15Evidence Act 1872, ss 25–26;
Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013
Right to a fair trialICCPR Art 14Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 35(3)
Right of appeal against conviction and sentenceICCPR Art 14(5)Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
Mandatory appellate review of death sentenceICCPR, Art 6;
ECOSOC Safeguards 1984
Code of Criminal Procedure 1898.
Right to seek pardon or clemencyICCPR Art 6(4)Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Art 49.
Independent investigation of torture complaintsUNCAT Art 12Torture and Custodial Death (Prohibition) Act 2013.
Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, s 132 requires government sanction to prosecute public officials
Independent monitoring of detention conditions (NPM)OPCAT (Bangladesh ratified 2025)National Human Rights Commission Act 2009 (found non-compliant with Paris Principle)
Right to serve sentence in home countryUN Model Agreement on Transfer of Foreign Prisoners 1985Bangladesh–India Agreement on Transfer of Sentenced Persons 2010.
No general domestic prisoner transfer statute

Legal Assistance Directory

Md Mehedi Hasan Bhuiyan

Human Rights Lawyer

Firm / Organisation

M.H. Bhuiyan & Associates

Bar Admission

Dhaka Bar Association, Supreme Court Bar Association

Courts / Jurisdictions:

Dhaka; Supreme Court of Bangladesh

Areas of Practice:

Death penalty

Languages

Bengali, English
Scroll to Top