DETAINED ABROAD
Foreign nationals imprisoned across the Indo-Pacific face acute vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. Unfamiliar laws, language barriers, and inadequate legal representation leave them disproportionately exposed to the risk of torture and ill-treatment in custody, and to the application of the death penalty. These risks are compounded when consular access is denied or delayed. Without timely notification of their right to embassy or consulate support, foreign nationals may unknowingly waive critical legal protections, face trial without adequate representation, and remain unaccounted for to their families for months or years.
Detained Abroad is a free legal resource that maps the rights of foreign nationals who are imprisoned, facing the death penalty, or at risk of torture across the Indo-Pacific region. For each country, it examines the applicable domestic legal framework, identifies where it falls short of international standards, and sets out the protections and remedies available in practice, including the procedures that allow foreign nationals to serve their sentences in their home country.
For a consolidated overview of the international legal standards referenced across this site, see the International Legal Framework page.
Indonesia
Death Penalty
International obligations:
Ratified
Not ratified
Torture & Ill-Treatment
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945
Law No 39 of 1999 on Human Rights
International obligations:
Ratified
Not Ratified
Imprisoned Foreign Nationals
International obligations:
Ratified (1982)
Law No 1 of 1982 (ratifying the VCCR), Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP)
Situation Overview
2026
NEW CRIMINAL CODE
Sentencing Reform
Read more…Transition to a ‘Probationary’ Death Penalty Model (2026) While Indonesia remains a retentionist state, it is currently in a major legal transition with the enactment of the New Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023), effective January 2026. This reform reclassifies the death penalty as a ‘special’ punishment and introduces a mandatory 10-year probationary period; if a death row inmate demonstrates ‘good behaviour,’ their sentence may be commuted to life imprisonment. However, rights groups note that death sentences continue to be issued at high rates (85 in 2024 alone) for drug offences.
64%
DRUG-RELATED CASES
Dominant Offence
Read more…Drug offences dominate the death row population. Indonesia has one of the largest death row populations in the Indo-Pacific, with 559 people under sentence of death as of end 2024, of whom 360 (64%) were convicted of drug offences. No executions have been carried out since 2016. At least 85 new death sentences were recorded in 2024, of which 64 were for drug-related offences and 21 for murder.
ICCPR
RESTRICTION ADVOCATED
International Pressure
Read more…UN treaty bodies have called for restriction of the death penalty. In its 2024 concluding observations on Indonesia, the UN Human Rights Committee recommended that Indonesia ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR and restrict capital punishment to the most serious crimes involving intentional killing. Drug offences were expressly identified as a particular concern.
OPCAT
NOT RATIFIED
Coerced Confessions
Read more…Systemic Torture and Lack of Independent Oversight: Despite constitutional protections, the domestic legal framework lacks an independent National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) because Indonesia has not yet ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT). International bodies and civil society organisations have documented concerns about coerced confessions, ill-treatment during police interrogation, and poor detention conditions, particularly in drug cases.
190%
CAPACITY RATE
Humanitarian Crisis
Read more…Chronic Prison Congestion and Life-Threatening Conditions: Prisons face a severe humanitarian crisis, operating at approximately 185-190% capacity as of late 2025.⁶ This overcrowding is largely driven by the ‘War on Drugs,’ with over 50% of the prison population detained for narcotics offences.⁷ These conditions result in inadequate sanitation, limited access to healthcare, and institutionalised violence, evidenced by the 2021 Tangerang prison fire which resulted in 49 deaths due to the inability to evacuate congested blocks.
Legal Framework in Practice
Detention & Identity
Who qualifies as a foreign national under Indonesian law?
Under Article 1 of Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration, a foreign national (orang asing) is any person who is not an Indonesian citizen. This is a citizenship-based definition that does not depend on residency status or immigration category.
Indonesian citizenship is governed by Law No. 12 of 2006 on Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia. Citizens include persons born to an Indonesian parent, persons naturalised under Indonesian law, and certain children born in Indonesia who would otherwise be stateless. Anyone not falling within these categories is legally a foreign national.
Indonesia does not generally recognise dual citizenship for adults. An Indonesian national who voluntarily acquires foreign nationality loses Indonesian citizenship by operation of law and is thereafter treated as a foreign national.
All immigration statuses (holders of visit visas, limited stay permits (KITAS), permanent stay permits (KITAP), visa-free entrants, and undocumented migrants) remain legally classified as foreign nationals for these purposes.[11]Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration (Indonesia) https://rimap.unhcr.org/node/42238; Law No. 12 of 2006 on Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/lawoncitizenship.pdf.
What are the basic rights of a foreign national upon arrest or detention
Foreign nationals are entitled to the same fundamental procedural rights as Indonesian citizens. These rights were established in the 1945 Constitution and 1981 Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and are preserved and modernised in the New Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 20 of 2025), which entered into force on 2 January 2026:
- Right to be informed of the grounds for arrest: A suspect must be told clearly, and in a language they understand, the reasons for their detention and the specific charges against them
- Right to make a statement freely: No statement or confession may be obtained through coercion, intimidation, or force. Statements obtained via torture are inadmissible under the exclusionary rules of the new code
- Right to legal counsel: A suspect has the right to be assisted by one or more lawyers at every stage of examination. Where the potential penalty is death or fifteen years or more, or where the suspect is indigent and faces a sentence of five years or more, state-appointed counsel is mandatory and free of charge
- Right to an interpreter: A suspect who does not understand or speak Bahasa Indonesia is entitled to the assistance of a competent interpreter at every stage of the proceedings.
- Right to freedom from torture: This is a non-derogable right guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution, applying to all persons within Indonesian jurisdiction regardless of nationality.
In practice: While the 2025 New KUHAP introduces modern “special track” (plea bargaining) procedures to increase efficiency, civil society organisations have criticised provisions that may allow for the implied waiver of counsel during early interrogations. This creates significant enforcement gaps, particularly for foreign nationals in remote regions where access to qualified legal aid and independent interpreters remains severely limited.[12]Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 https://jdih.bapeten.go.id/unggah/dokumen/peraturan/116-full.pdf; Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Indonesia-Code-of-Criminal-Procedure-1981-eng.pdf; Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/vcv.pdf; US Department of State, ‘Indonesia 2024 Human Rights Report’ (2024) https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/indonesia/; Maidina Rahmawati, ‘Draconian and Illiberal: Indonesia’s New KUHAP Is Worse than the Old One’ (Indonesia at Melbourne, 10 December 2025) https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/draconian-and-illiberal-indonesias-new-kuhap-is-worse-than-the-old-one/.
What right does a foreign national have to contact their embassy or consulate?
Indonesia is a party to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR), and this international obligation is integrated into the domestic legal system through several key instruments:
- Mandatory Notification upon Arrest: Under Law No. 1 of 1983, which formally ratified the VCCR into Indonesian law, authorities are required to inform the relevant consular post of the arrest or detention of one of its nationals “without delay.”
- Procedural Requirements (KUHAP): While the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) focuses primarily on the rights of the accused generally, it mandates that any person subjected to arrest or detention be given the opportunity to communicate with the outside world, which includes diplomatic representatives for foreign nationals (Article 57).
In practice: Despite the clarity of Law No. 1 of 1982, international observers and best practices manuals for lawyers note that “without delay” is frequently misinterpreted by local law enforcement. In many cases, embassies are not notified until several days or even weeks after the initial arrest, which can severely prejudice the suspect’s ability to secure competent legal counsel during the critical early stages of an investigation.[13]Law No. 37 of 1999 on Foreign Relations (Indonesia) https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1999/en/147504; Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Indonesia-Code-of-Criminal-Procedure-1981-eng.pdf; ECPM and Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide, Representing Individuals Facing the Death Penalty in Indonesia: A Best Practices Manual (2023) https://www.ecpm.org/app/uploads/2023/06/Guide-Avocat-indone%CC%81sie-GB-130623-bdCouv.pdf; UN Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding observations on the second periodic report of Indonesia’ (3 May 2024) UN Doc CCPR/C/IDN/CO/2 https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/concluding-observations/ccprcidnco2-concluding-observations-second-periodic-report.
What protections exist for foreign nationals who have no embassy, or who are stateless or a refugee?
Indonesia is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or its 1967 Protocol and has no comprehensive domestic refugee or asylum law. Protection operates through two main frameworks:
- Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 on the Handling of Foreign Refugees establishes administrative procedures for identifying, sheltering, and managing refugees and asylum seekers, and formally recognises UNHCR’s role in conducting refugee status determination.
- Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights applies to all persons regardless of nationality, guaranteeing equal treatment before the law and access to legal remedies.
Where a detained foreign national has no consular representation (because they are stateless, their country has no embassy in Indonesia, or they hold refugee status) UNHCR serves as the primary point of contact in practice. Its involvement in such cases is recognised under the 2016 regulation but is not guaranteed.[14]Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 on the Handling of Foreign Refugees (Indonesia, 31 December 2016) https://www.unhcr.org/id/sites/id/files/legacy-pdf/Presidential-Regulation-on-the-Handling-of-Foreign-Refugees-English.pdf; Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (Indonesia, 23 September 1999) https://www.justice.gov/file/291456/dl?inline=.
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
Is legal representation state-provided or does a foreign national need to arrange it independently?
A foreign national facing criminal charges in Indonesia may arrange private legal representation at any stage. Where they cannot, two separate legal frameworks provide for state assistance, but with important differences in scope and eligibility.
Mandatory court-appointed counsel (KUHAP)
Under the Criminal Procedure Code, authorities are obliged to appoint a lawyer free of charge regardless of nationality, provided:
- The charge carries the death penalty or imprisonment of fifteen years or more; or
- The suspect is indigent and faces a sentence of five years or more.
This obligation applies at every stage (investigation, prosecution, and trial). It is strictly preserved in the New Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 20 of 2025) which entered into force on 2 January 2026. For foreign nationals on death row, this is the primary legal basis for state-funded representation.
State legal aid (Law No. 16 of 2011)
Beyond the KUHAP threshold, Law No. 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid establishes a national legal aid programme providing free assistance in criminal, civil, and administrative matters. Legal aid is delivered through accredited civil society legal aid organisations (Lembaga Bantuan Hukum, LBH) reimbursed by the state. In practice:
- Eligibility is limited to “poor” persons who cannot meet their basic rights independently (art 5).
- Applicants must provide a certificate of low-income status issued by a village head or equivalent local official.
- This requirement presents a structural obstacle for foreign nationals, who may have no access to Indonesian civil registration to obtain the certificate.
Practical gaps: The legal aid system is significantly underfunded and geographically uneven, with provision concentrated in major cities. Foreign nationals who do not qualify under the KUHAP mandatory threshold and cannot navigate the poverty certification process may be left without any state-funded representation in practice.[15]Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) (Indonesia) https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/vcv.pdf; Law No. 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid (Indonesia); Tim Lindsey, ‘Why Legal Aid Is Not Working in Indonesia’ (Indonesia at Melbourne, 2019) https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/why-legal-aid-is-not-working-in-indonesia/.
Torture & Ill-Treatment
What legal protections exist against torture and ill-treatment in Indonesia?
Indonesia ratified UNCAT in 1998, creating binding obligations to prevent, criminalise, and investigate torture. It has not ratified the Optional Protocol to CAT (OPCAT), which would establish a system of independent visits to places of detention.
Constitutional and statutory protections apply to all persons regardless of nationality:
- Constitutional Protection: The 1945 Constitution prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as non-derogable rights that cannot be limited under any circumstances, including states of emergency.
- The New Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023): Effective January 2, 2026, torture is explicitly criminalised as a standalone offence This addresses a longstanding gap: previously, acts of torture by police could only be prosecuted under general maltreatment provisions, which did not cover mental suffering and fell short of the UNCAT definition.
- Procedural Safeguards (KUHAP): The 1981 Criminal Procedure Code and the 2025 New KUHAP mandate that suspects have the right to provide statements freely. Any confession or statement obtained through coercion, force, or torture is legally inadmissible in court.
- Human Rights Law (Law No. 39/1999): This law reiterates the prohibition of torture and provides a mandate for the National Commission on Human Rights to monitor and investigate violations.
Despite these protections, the UN Committee Against Torture expressed deep concern about routine, widespread torture by law enforcement, noting that the Attorney-General’s office lacked independence in prosecuting allegations. Human rights organisations record ongoing patterns of custodial ill-treatment. Accountability mechanisms remain weak: Komnas HAM and the National Police Commission (Kompolnas) can receive complaints and investigate but have no power to refer cases directly to the public prosecutor.[16]Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (Indonesia) https://www.justice.gov/file/291456/dl?inline=; Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/vcv.pdf; Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code; Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code.
What recourse is available if a foreign national has been tortured or mistreated in custody?
A foreign national who has been tortured or mistreated in custody in Indonesia has the following potential avenues of complaint and redress:
- Criminal complaint: A complaint can be lodged with the police or the Attorney-General’s Office alleging maltreatment or, under the new Criminal Code (in force from January 2026), torture as a distinct offence. In practice, criminal investigations into police conduct are rare: investigations involving police misconduct are typically carried out internally.
- Komnas HAM (National Human Rights Commission): Complaints can be submitted to Komnas HAM, which has authority to investigate allegations of human rights violations including torture. However, Komnas HAM’s findings carry only the force of recommendations, it cannot refer cases directly to the public prosecutor, and Komnas HAM itself has been criticised for delayed processing. Nonetheless, they can be used to trigger an investigation by the Attorney General’s Office.
- LPSK (Witness and Victim Protection Agency): Victims of torture may apply to LPSK for protection and support during legal proceedings. LPSK can provide physical protection, psychological rehabilitation, and assistance with compensation claims, but requires a Komnas HAM recommendation to act in gross human rights violation cases, creating a dependency on Komnas HAM’s processes.
- Civil claim for compensation: Under Law No. 39 of 1999, victims of human rights violations have the right to seek compensation through civil proceedings. In practice, successful compensation claims against public officials are rare and the process is resource-intensive.
- Human Rights Court: Law No. 26 of 2000 establishes a Human Rights Court to try gross human rights violations including torture at a systemic level. Its record is limited: in three cases brought before it to date, all convictions at first instance were overturned on appeal, resulting in a zero-conviction rate.
There is no standalone independent torture investigation mechanism in Indonesia. OPCAT has not been ratified, meaning there is no formal National Preventive Mechanism for systematic monitoring of detention facilities.
In practice: Despite the new 2026 laws, international monitors classify Indonesia as a “High Risk” jurisdiction for torture. They note that physical violence is still frequently used to extract confessions during the initial 24–48 hours of detention. Because medical-legal examinations in state facilities rarely follow the international Istanbul Protocol, it is vital for foreign nationals to request an independent medical evaluation through their embassy as soon as possible to preserve evidence for future legal recourse.[17]Law No. 26 of 2000 on Human Rights Courts (Indonesia) https://policehumanrightsresources.org/content/uploads/2019/07/Law-26-2000-Act-on-the-Human-Rights-Courts-2000-Eng.pdf?x80005; OMCT, ‘Global Torture Index 2025: Indonesia Factsheet’ (2025) https://www.omct.org/en/global-torture-index; Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (Indonesia) https://www.justice.gov/file/291456/dl?inline=; TAPOL, ‘Human Rights Court Mechanism and the 2014 Paniai Papua Case’ (2022) https://tapol.org/publications/human-rights-court-mechanism-and-2014-paniai-papua-case.
DEATH PENALTY
Which offences carry the death penalty in Indonesia?
Indonesia retains the death penalty for at least 50 criminal offences. The last executions took place in July 2016; there has been a de facto moratorium since then, though courts continue to impose death sentences and the current government has signalled willingness to resume executions.
Under the previous legal framework, the death penalty was a “primary” punishment. Under the New Criminal Code (2026), it has been reclassified as a “special punishment” to be used only as a last resort. Capital offences are spread across several laws, including but not limited to:
- Drug trafficking — Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics; accounts for approximately 60% of death row (around 360 of 559 people as of end 2024, overwhelmingly convicted under this law)
- Murder — Premeditated murder
- Terrorism — Law No. 5 of 2018 on Terrorism
- Corruption in extreme cases — Law No. 31 of 1999 on Corruption Eradication
- National Security — Treason, espionage, or assisting an enemy during wartime.
- Crimes Against Humanity — Genocide or systematic human rights violations (Law No. 26 of 2000
The new Criminal Code also removed the death penalty for certain old-code offences, including unlawful possession of firearms and some wartime military offences.
A critical gap for foreign nationals: Drug trafficking accounts for the overwhelming majority of foreign nationals on death row. In 2024, HRI confirmed 73 drug-related death sentences, with foreign nationals disproportionately represented. The UN Human Rights Committee, in its 2024 concluding observations on Indonesia, recommended restricting capital punishment to the most serious crimes (understood to mean intentional killing) and explicitly flagged drug offences as incompatible with that standard under ICCPR Article 6.[18]ECPM, ‘Infographics: The Death Penalty in Indonesia 2024’ (2025), available at: ecpm.org; ECPM, Universal Periodic Review Indonesia: Joint Submission on the Death Penalty (September 2022), available at: ecpm.org; Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Indonesia’ (3 May 2024) UN Doc CCPR/C/IDN/CO/2, available at: ohchr.org; Amnesty International, Death Sentences and Executions 2024 (2025), available at: amnesty.org.au; Harm Reduction International, The Death Penalty for Drug Offences (2025), available at: hri.global
What additional protections apply to a foreign national facing a capital charge?
No specific domestic statutory provision creates enhanced protections for foreign nationals facing capital charges in Indonesia beyond those available to all defendants. The protections that apply in practice derive from the following:
- Mandatory Legal Representation: Under the Criminal Procedure Code, the state must appoint a lawyer for anyone facing a death sentence if they cannot provide their own. This is a non-negotiable right at all stages of the process.
- Consular Access: Per the Vienna Convention (VCCR) and Law No. 1 of 1982, the defendant has the right to have their consulate notified “without delay” and the right to communicate with consular officials to arrange for a legal defence.
- Translation Services: The right to a competent interpreter is guaranteed for those who do not speak Indonesian to ensure they understand the charges and the evidence against them.
Can evidence or documentation from a foreign national’s home country be submitted in proceedings?
The general evidentiary framework under the 1981 KUHAP, and its successor Law No. 20 of 2025, governs what material courts may consider, without distinction between domestic and foreign sources.
- Written Evidence: Documents from abroad (e.g., medical records, character references, or bank statements) are admissible under the Criminal Procedure Code.
- Legalisation Requirement: To be valid in an Indonesian court, foreign documents must usually be apostilled or legalised by the Indonesian Embassy in the home country and the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights.
- Witness Testimony: Evidence can be provided via depositions or, increasingly, through video conferencing if a witness cannot travel to Indonesia, provided the judge grants permission.
A practical gap: There is no procedural guarantee that courts will assign weight to foreign evidence or expert testimony, particularly in narcotics cases where courts have historically applied mandatory-style sentencing approaches.[19]Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) (Indonesia) https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Indonesia-Code-of-Criminal-Procedure-1981-eng.pdf.
What pardon or clemency mechanisms are available?
The clemency framework in Indonesia operates under the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 22 of 2002 on Clemency, as amended by Law No. 5 of 2010.
Constitutional basis: Article 14(1) of the Constitution vests the clemency power in the President, who grants or rejects applications “by having regard to the determination” of the Court. Traditionally, applying for clemency (Grasi) has been viewed in Indonesian jurisprudence as a tacit admission of guilt, as one is asking for mercy for a crime committed.
Procedure:
- A clemency application may be submitted by the prisoner, their legal representative, or family members, within one year of a final and binding court decision.
- The application is forwarded to the court of first instance, which transmits it to the Supreme Court.
- The Supreme Court must provide a written opinion to the President within 30 days.
- The President then decides, after seeking advice from the Vice-President, relevant ministers, and other officials if considered necessary. The decision must conform to the Supreme Court’s opinion.
- The President may reduce or nullify the sentence. There is no obligation to give reasons for the decision.
The new Criminal Code: From 2 January 2026, the new Criminal Code introduced an additional mechanism operating independently of presidential clemency. Death sentences are now provisional: after a 10-year probationary period, a sentenced person’s conduct is reviewed, and the sentence may be commuted to life imprisonment with Presidential approval and Supreme Court consideration. This is distinct from the Clemency Law process and does not require acknowledgement of guilt in the same way.[20]Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 https://jdih.bapeten.go.id/unggah/dokumen/peraturan/116-full.pdf; Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (Indonesia); ADPAN, Clemency Procedures in East and Southeast Asia (2021) https://adpan.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Clemency-Process-in-East-and-Southeast-Asia-Rev1.0.pdf.
Repatriation
Under what conditions can a foreign national apply to serve their sentence in their home country?
Indonesia has no dedicated prisoner transfer legislation. As of March 2026, Indonesia is in the process of transitioning from an ad hoc diplomatic approach to a formal statutory framework for prisoner repatriation. While a dedicated Prisoner Transfer Bill has been a priority for the Ministry of Law and Human Rights since 2025, transfers are currently conducted through bilateral diplomatic arrangements.
In the absence of domestic legislation, transfers have taken place on a case-by-case basis through bilateral agreements (primarily in the form of Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) agreements in criminal matters) and are subject to diplomatic negotiation between Indonesia and the prisoner’s home country.
The following conditions appear to apply in practice, based on the transfers that have taken place:
- Citizenship: the prisoner must be a national of the receiving country
- Voluntary consent: written approval from the prisoner is required
- Final conviction: the sentence must be final; transfers are not available where appeals remain pending
- Dual criminality: the offence must be punishable under the law of both countries
- Consent of both governments: both Indonesia and the home country must approve the transfer
Where a transfer is approved, the home country assumes responsibility for enforcing the remainder of the sentence.
Recent practice under President Prabowo Subianto (from late 2024): Indonesia has pursued an active repatriation policy as a matter of government priority. The government has stated that it intends to pursue further agreements with Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. The UN subsequently upgraded its assessment of Indonesia from “negative” to “neutral” following the early transfers.[21]‘Indonesia, Yemen in Talks for Prisoner Transfer’ Jakarta Globe (28 February 2026) https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-yemen-in-talks-for-prisoner-transfer; KontraS and ECPM, ‘Joint Submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture’ (2025) https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/cfi-subm/global-trends-developments/subm-global-trends-developments-cso-54-co-kontras-ecpm.pdf; ‘Indonesia’s New Foreign Prisoner Transfer Policy: Reducing Costs’ ANTARA News (3 February 2025) https://en.antaranews.com/news/343526/indonesias-new-foreign-prisoner-transfer-policy-reducing-costs.
Rights Matrix
Foreign nationals imprisoned in Indonesia face distinct vulnerabilities that require enhanced legal protections beyond those afforded to Indonesian nationals. The following table outlines the specific rights available to foreign nationals imprisoned in Indonesia under both international and domestic law, highlighting where protections exist and where critical gaps remain.
| Right | International Law | Domestic Law |
|---|---|---|
| Right to be informed of grounds for arrest | ICCPR Article 9(2); Body of Principles, Principle 10 | Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP) |
| Right to make a statement free from coercion | ICCPR Article 14(3)(g); UNCAT Articles 1, 15 | Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945; Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP) |
| Right to legal counsel | ICCPR Article 14(3)(b),(d) | Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP); Law No. 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid |
| Right to an interpreter | ICCPR Article 14(3)(f) | Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP) |
| Right to consular notification and access | VCCR Article 36; ICCPR Article 6 (in capital cases) | Law No. 1 of 1982 |
| Right to freedom from torture and ill-treatment | UNCAT Articles 1, 2, 16; ICCPR Articles 7, 10 | Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945; Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights; Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code) |
| Right to a fair trial | ICCPR Articles 14, 15 | Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP) |
| Right to submit evidence in one’s defence | ICCPR Article 14(3)(e) | Law No. 20 of 2025 (New KUHAP) |
| Right to seek clemency | ICCPR Article 6(4) | Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945; Law No. 22 of 2002 on Clemency (as amended); Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code) |
| Right to apply for prisoner transfer | UN Model Agreement on the Transfer of Foreign Prisoners (1985) | No dedicated domestic legislation — transfers conducted on a case-by-case basis through bilateral MLA agreements |
Legal Assistance Directory
Aisya Humaida
Human Rights Lawyer
Firm / Organisation
Bar Admission
Courts / Jurisdictions:
Areas of Practice:
Languages
Contact
- This lawyer has consented to be contacted by foreign nationals, families, and consular officials in urgent cases.
